4 ms·
I thought the same, but what it (and this has happened before) one of D.T’s followers sees this and shoots people? Afaik the post said something to the effect o
by alpacaillama 6y ago
I thought the same, but what it (and this has happened before) one of D.T’s followers sees this and shoots people?
Afaik the post said something to the effect of “Rioter’s should be shot” not by the police or a government force. But just a general statement.
Also i am saddened how the goal posts have moved. Before this it was that people who spew vitriol should be deplatformed but now we are at how this counts as government action?
Also if I was hypothetically a dictator about to do an ethnic cleansing, and post the same thing, would it still be ok? Tbh this isn’t even a hypothetical since Facebook was used in a genocide in Myanmar and did nothing but agreed they fucked up later to 0 accountability.
- lsiebert 6y agoreminds me of this honestly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_no_one_rid_me_of_this_turbulent_priest https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_no_one_rid_me_of_this_tur...
- tareqak 6y agoIt also reminds me of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_wolf_(terrorism)#Stochastic_terrorism https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lone_wolf_(terrorism)#Stocha... .
- contrast 6y agoThe post was by the most senior individual in government. When the commander in chief says something should happen, then obviously - completely and utterly obviously - that specifically encourages and endorses such action by the police and military. It’s not just a general statement.