Thanks for explaining where you're coming from here. I'll offer my perspective. I replied to your original comment, indicating my belief that the issue is subs

Thanks for explaining where you're coming from here. I'll offer my perspective. I replied to your original comment, indicating my belief that the issue is substantially more complicated than your framing suggested, and briefly explained a couple reasons why. I have several more, if you honestly have any interest. Your reply was to claim it is just about your property rights - the only relation to my comment was the response hierarchy. I honestly still don't see how that's not a refusal to engage. One point: > claims that I support state violence Well, what do you call what's going on? (I do also consider intrusive surveillance a form of violence, but understand why some think that's dilutive to the term.)