> I still believe 90% of users would be better served by Nomad. Well sure, but if the story just ended with "everyone use the least exciting tool", then there'

> I still believe 90% of users would be better served by Nomad. Well sure, but if the story just ended with "everyone use the least exciting tool", then there'd be few articles for tech journals to write. But Kubernetes promises so much, and deep down everyone subtly thinks "what if I have to scale my project?" Why settle for good enough when you could settle for "awesome"? It's just human nature to choose the most exciting thing. And given that I do agree that there's some manufactured hype around Kubernetes, it isn't surprising to me why few are talking about Nomad.