4 ms·
Well, there's already a SHA-512. But none of the SHA family of hashes have ever been recommended for passwords, not because they are weak, but because they are
by LeoPanthera 6y ago
Well, there's already a SHA-512.
But none of the SHA family of hashes have ever been recommended for passwords, not because they are weak, but because they are too fast.
For other purposes, the logical successor to SHA-256/512 is SHA-3:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3
But this is far from the only choice. Hashing algorithms are trendy right now, and there's plenty to choose from.
- dependenttypes 6y agoI am not sure why you mentioned passwords. Collision attacks do not affect the use of hash functions for password hashing.
- ww520 6y agoFor collision avoidance, not for cryptographic hashing.