4 ms·
There was never any russian collusion, we know that for a fact now. HN can continue to censor this but it's true, and Twitter not recognizing that as disinforma
by Overtonwindow 6y ago
There was never any russian collusion, we know that for a fact now. HN can continue to censor this but it's true, and Twitter not recognizing that as disinformation is why they should be regulated.
- Simulacra 6y agoFrom the Editorial Board of the Wall Street Journal: "Newly released documents show he [Adam Schiff] knew all along that there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion." https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts- https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts... 11589326164 So why not put a disclaimer on every politician that says there WAS collusion, or claiming to have evidence of collusion?
- coolgeek 6y agoHere are some actual facts, rather than assertions or WSJ editorials (as opposed to reported articles) https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-reports-findings-on-collusion/ https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to-the-mueller-repo... It's almost surreal that users named Overtonwindow and Simulacra are pushing the "no collusion" narrative
- bedhesd 6y agoThanks for checking in, but it still is contrary to what the House of Representatives founds. Your truth that there was collusion is met with other truths that there were not. Is it twitter's role to decide who is right?
- coolgeek 6y agoThe Republicans on HPSCI found what they wanted to find, and avoided finding what they didn't want to find. See the HPSCI minority report for the specific details on this. Much of the HPSCI majority report is also contradicted by: - bipartisan Senate reports - the Special Counsel's report - the Special Counsel's indictments - the FBI, as well as the intelligence community (in toto) - the DOJ and intelligence Inspectors General IOW, it was contradicted by everybody else