3 ms·
I wouldn't be too happy, but to me violence is damaging a living thing. Not property.
by augustt 6y ago
I wouldn't be too happy, but to me violence is damaging a living thing. Not property.
- Nasrudith 6y agoThere is an implied threat and cohersion to it of "do it or else" or "I can break you too". That is the violence against the person. Smashing your own car in front of somebody's house wouldn't include that threat as it is their property to what they wish although it would make you look crazy.
- NikolaeVarius 6y agoI have a cane that I need to use to walk. Somebody breaks my cane. What is that?
- Rychard 6y agoSuch a scenario would be unfortunate. The lack of context makes it impossible to determine with any certainty.
- vkou 6y agoIt's something similar to buying up the rights for, and increasing the price of a life-necessarry drug by 2000%. Is that also violence?
- wtetzner 6y agoI can see an argument that it is.
- tareqak 6y agoWas the cane broken intentionally or unintentionally?