5 ms·

Great article! Your dashboard is not ugly, it's special :) I also broke up from Google Analytics, but I didn't sacrifice the insights, I even gained more. I cr

by XCSme 6y ago

Great article! Your dashboard is not ugly, it's special :) I also broke up from Google Analytics, but I didn't sacrifice the insights, I even gained more. I created a self-hosted analytics[0] platform to replace Google Analytics which is not as complex, but powerful enough to give you all the data the you need. I also had the fear of missing out if I removed GA, but I realized that I only use a small subset of the data they store, and after implementing those in my dashboard I no longer found the need to check out GA. Today I rely solely on userTrack and removed all Google 3rd party includes from my site (just yesterday I uploaded the Google fonts files to my server, so I no longer include them from Google's domain). Another surprising benefit is that my dashboard loads a lot faster that the GA dashboard. [0]: https://www.usertrack.net/ https://www.usertrack.net/

zomglings 6y ago
usertrack looks pretty cool. I am looking to move away from Google Analytics as well and may give this a try. It looks like paying for usertrack gives access to the source code, but not much else?
- XCSme 6y ago
  Thanks! Yes, it's a self-hosted platform, so you pay a one-time fee and you can download the product. You then have to upload it to a web server (I use a $5/mo DigitalOcean droplet) and use the auto-installer. There is short installation guide here: https://docs.usertrack.net/installation https://docs.usertrack.net/installation If your already have a server running the LAMP stack you can add userTrack to it instead of getting a new server, as it's pretty efficient. I was planning to also add a hosted (SaaS) variant, but if you think about it, it doesn't really make sense: you can just spin up your own DigitalOcean VPS (for cheaper than I would offer it to you) with a few clicks and have userTrack already installed on it. It's better for you for privacy, cost and performance. I am thus trying instead to educate the public more and promote the self-hosting movement, as nowdays it's really easy to run your own services (Docker, cloud-init and image marketplaces make it very easy to setup a server in a few clicks with the software that you need). I see this as the future, where every person can just run one or more virtual servers with the software that they use, instead of paying large monthly fees to big companies for a worse experience, companies that also sell their private data.
  - zomglings 6y ago
    Have you considered releasing configurations for the VPS setup on the Cloud marketplaces? I would much rather deploy onto my infrastructure with one click and pay you a few dollars a month than have to set things up myself.
    - XCSme 6y ago
      I checked out the DigitalOcean marketplace but it looked like there are only open-source applications there, or it was really confusing how you can publish a premium script there. That being said, userTrack does provide a cloud-init configuration for one-click install (which works on DigitalOcean for example). So currently, if the VPS provider supports images and cloud-init, you just have to select a LAMP image, paste the userTrack cloud-init and the VPS will spin-up with a functional userTrack dashboard running on it. I have also considered sharing it as a Docker container, but that makes it slower to install (have to share the full image) and there is again no easy way to share premium Docker images, as you have to host your own Docker repository.
kohtatsu 6y ago
https://dashboard.usertrack.net/sites/usertrack.net/visitors/playback/7165 https://dashboard.usertrack.net/sites/usertrack.net/visitors... Collecting scroll and mouse movements is enough to build a fingerprint on people. It's also creepy, this kind of stuff needs to be opt-in. You could record first and only send to the server after they've granted permission with a clear dialog like "can we send your mouse movements and page interaction to the webmaster?" No idea on how that plays into GDPR, but you'll want to take that into account with something like this. Overall it's better than Google having all that data, and congrats on building something cool, I like it minus the minutiae that you capture.
- XCSme 6y ago
  Thanks for the suggestions! There is an option to display a consent window before tracking. Currently I have it disabled on my site, as it's more for demo purposes. I do agree that it feels a bit creepy to see a recording of yourself, but for static landing pages (where no private data is shared) it poses no privacy risks. I do plan to working on improving the privacy of the platform itself, by allowing better granularity of the things that are tracked (eg. you don't care about recordings? you can disable them). Currently all the tracking is done cookie-less, there is some more info about privacy here: https://docs.usertrack.net/personal-data-information https://docs.usertrack.net/personal-data-information > Overall it's better than Google having all that data, and congrats on building something cool, I like it minus the minutiae that you capture. With userTrack I don't try to replace Google Analytics with a self-hosted platform that is only more "creepy", but also offer a self-hosted alternative to services like Hotjar and FullStory. The difference is that those services not only have the data across multiple domains, but also store the entire HTML content and all changes on the page, meaning that if you have a Chrome Extension that adds some private content to a page (eg. you have a snippet extension that loads reply templates and displays them on the page), this content will also be stored and sent to their servers. userTrack only stores the URL of the page and all actions done (clicks, movements, scroll, window resize, optional text input), meaning that it doesn't actually track your private information if it is added to a login-protected page (eg. your private user dashboard). Overall I think this can lead to a huge privacy boost for both users and webmasters, while still empowering webmasters with data: * No single authority has the browsing data of a user across domains * No more 3rd party cookies and requests, you can host everything on the same domain as your site * You decide how intrusive you want the tracking to be, not the platform. I still have work to do when it comes to privacy, but I do see this as being the future for responsible webmasters.

by XCSme 6y ago

zomglings 6y ago

usertrack looks pretty cool. I am looking to move away from Google Analytics as well and may give this a try. It looks like paying for usertrack gives access to the source code, but not much else?

XCSme 6y ago
Thanks! Yes, it's a self-hosted platform, so you pay a one-time fee and you can download the product. You then have to upload it to a web server (I use a $5/mo DigitalOcean droplet) and use the auto-installer. There is short installation guide here: https://docs.usertrack.net/installation https://docs.usertrack.net/installation If your already have a server running the LAMP stack you can add userTrack to it instead of getting a new server, as it's pretty efficient. I was planning to also add a hosted (SaaS) variant, but if you think about it, it doesn't really make sense: you can just spin up your own DigitalOcean VPS (for cheaper than I would offer it to you) with a few clicks and have userTrack already installed on it. It's better for you for privacy, cost and performance. I am thus trying instead to educate the public more and promote the self-hosting movement, as nowdays it's really easy to run your own services (Docker, cloud-init and image marketplaces make it very easy to setup a server in a few clicks with the software that you need). I see this as the future, where every person can just run one or more virtual servers with the software that they use, instead of paying large monthly fees to big companies for a worse experience, companies that also sell their private data.
- zomglings 6y ago
  Have you considered releasing configurations for the VPS setup on the Cloud marketplaces? I would much rather deploy onto my infrastructure with one click and pay you a few dollars a month than have to set things up myself.
  - XCSme 6y ago
    I checked out the DigitalOcean marketplace but it looked like there are only open-source applications there, or it was really confusing how you can publish a premium script there. That being said, userTrack does provide a cloud-init configuration for one-click install (which works on DigitalOcean for example). So currently, if the VPS provider supports images and cloud-init, you just have to select a LAMP image, paste the userTrack cloud-init and the VPS will spin-up with a functional userTrack dashboard running on it. I have also considered sharing it as a Docker container, but that makes it slower to install (have to share the full image) and there is again no easy way to share premium Docker images, as you have to host your own Docker repository.

kohtatsu 6y ago

https://dashboard.usertrack.net/sites/usertrack.net/visitors/playback/7165 https://dashboard.usertrack.net/sites/usertrack.net/visitors... Collecting scroll and mouse movements is enough to build a fingerprint on people. It's also creepy, this kind of stuff needs to be opt-in. You could record first and only send to the server after they've granted permission with a clear dialog like "can we send your mouse movements and page interaction to the webmaster?" No idea on how that plays into GDPR, but you'll want to take that into account with something like this. Overall it's better than Google having all that data, and congrats on building something cool, I like it minus the minutiae that you capture.

XCSme 6y ago
Thanks for the suggestions! There is an option to display a consent window before tracking. Currently I have it disabled on my site, as it's more for demo purposes. I do agree that it feels a bit creepy to see a recording of yourself, but for static landing pages (where no private data is shared) it poses no privacy risks. I do plan to working on improving the privacy of the platform itself, by allowing better granularity of the things that are tracked (eg. you don't care about recordings? you can disable them). Currently all the tracking is done cookie-less, there is some more info about privacy here: https://docs.usertrack.net/personal-data-information https://docs.usertrack.net/personal-data-information > Overall it's better than Google having all that data, and congrats on building something cool, I like it minus the minutiae that you capture. With userTrack I don't try to replace Google Analytics with a self-hosted platform that is only more "creepy", but also offer a self-hosted alternative to services like Hotjar and FullStory. The difference is that those services not only have the data across multiple domains, but also store the entire HTML content and all changes on the page, meaning that if you have a Chrome Extension that adds some private content to a page (eg. you have a snippet extension that loads reply templates and displays them on the page), this content will also be stored and sent to their servers. userTrack only stores the URL of the page and all actions done (clicks, movements, scroll, window resize, optional text input), meaning that it doesn't actually track your private information if it is added to a login-protected page (eg. your private user dashboard). Overall I think this can lead to a huge privacy boost for both users and webmasters, while still empowering webmasters with data: * No single authority has the browsing data of a user across domains * No more 3rd party cookies and requests, you can host everything on the same domain as your site * You decide how intrusive you want the tracking to be, not the platform. I still have work to do when it comes to privacy, but I do see this as being the future for responsible webmasters.