3 ms·

It's true that the president's writing here is characteristically vague. But right here in this one tweet he: 1. Introduces the military 2. Says he will assu

It's true that the president's writing here is characteristically vague. But right here in this one tweet he: 1. Introduces the military 2. Says he will assume control 3. Introduces the idea of shooting looters Given that context, it's extremely difficult to concoct an interpretation where he's not saying he'll direct the military to shoot looters. I mean, be serious here. Is your defense really that "The president's grammar was poor, so you can't prove he meant what he seemed to say". How many times are you going to try that trick? Wasn't it played out after he vaguely suggested injecting bleach?

MaxBarraclough 6y ago
In the interests of precision, Trump didn't suggest that people try injecting bleach, he suggested that researchers look into injecting disinfectant as a means of treating those with the virus. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52407177 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52407177 I see I'm being downvoted. Is my account of things incorrect, or is it because I didn't explicitly spell out that it's silly for a president to give brain-dead research advice to experts?
- 101404 6y ago
  Yes, that's another thing Trump said that was purposefully "misunderstood". There are many things to criticize him for. But sadly the media is so incredibly lazy that they constantly make up these "scandals" about things he supposedly "meant". And: you are downvoted because you are not following groupthink. It doesn't matter how factually correct it is.
  - MaxBarraclough 6y ago
    The truth of it is still scandalous. Does it absolve Trump of responsibility for idiots drinking disinfectant? At least partially, yes. It's still a ridiculous way for a leader to behave. It's absurd that Trump thought he was in a position to give technical advice to medical researchers, and it's even more absurd that he thought injecting disinfectant could be the way to go. The hubris and ignorance on display here are shocking.

MaxBarraclough 6y ago

In the interests of precision, Trump didn't suggest that people try injecting bleach, he suggested that researchers look into injecting disinfectant as a means of treating those with the virus. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52407177 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-52407177 I see I'm being downvoted. Is my account of things incorrect, or is it because I didn't explicitly spell out that it's silly for a president to give brain-dead research advice to experts?

101404 6y ago
Yes, that's another thing Trump said that was purposefully "misunderstood". There are many things to criticize him for. But sadly the media is so incredibly lazy that they constantly make up these "scandals" about things he supposedly "meant". And: you are downvoted because you are not following groupthink. It doesn't matter how factually correct it is.
- MaxBarraclough 6y ago
  The truth of it is still scandalous. Does it absolve Trump of responsibility for idiots drinking disinfectant? At least partially, yes. It's still a ridiculous way for a leader to behave. It's absurd that Trump thought he was in a position to give technical advice to medical researchers, and it's even more absurd that he thought injecting disinfectant could be the way to go. The hubris and ignorance on display here are shocking.