6 ms·
How about this one: https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1086927762634399744?lang=en https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1086927762634399744?...
by misiti3780 6y ago
How about this one:
https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1086927762634399744?lang=en https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1086927762634399744?...
- jrockway 6y agoThe Trump crowd sure hates Kathy Griffin today. Do you guys know that she is a comedian and not the President of the United States?
- misiti3780 6y agoim not the trump crowd
- jrockway 6y agoIf you read the replies to Trump's tweet on Twitter, half of them are whining about Kathy Griffin. She's their favorite example of how Twitter has a liberal bias today. Maybe you coincidentally picked the same example as them.
- misiti3780 6y agoI listen to both sides, and I don't pay attention to what people say on twitter too much (it's the not "real" world). again, I'm not saying this tweet is equal to what trump said, it's clearly not --- But if someone had harmed or killed one of these kids because of this dox, I'm not sure your objections would stand. And with 2.1M followers, that is in realm of possibilities Do you think twitter has a liberal bias?
- messick 6y agonah, but truth and reality does. Sorry your dude is having a sad because mean Jack won't let him tweet about gunning down American citizens.
- misiti3780 6y agoAs i said above, I'm not a trump supporter.
- adamch 6y agoYou could say requesting dox is a form of violence. But it's a lot less violent than ordering the military to shoot people. It's reasonable that a policy of removing tweets that glorify violence would catch one but not the other.
- misiti3780 6y agoagreed, im not saying this is equal to trump, but i don't think anyone here downvoting me would want to be doxed by someone with 2.1 million followers, regardless of if she is a comedian or not.
- lukaa 6y ago''But it's a lot less violent than ordering the military to shoot people.'' You know, he is president, that gives him right to use or threaten with violence if he thinks that safety of country is seriously in danger. If you think that he is breaking constitution there is court to decide about that.
- Jtsummers 6y ago> ''But it's a lot less violent than ordering the military to shoot people.'' You know, he is president, that gives him right to use or threaten with violence if he thinks that safety of country is seriously in danger. If you think that he is breaking constitution there is court to decide about that. That's actually not true. There are legal bounds to what violence he can and cannot threaten. The President is not a dictator, in which case you would be correct. And we don't have to wait for a court to decide that the order is illegal. Members of the military are actually supposed to refuse illegal orders, not obey them blindly like good little Nazis.
- lukaa 6y agoUnfortunately, what you are saying lead to anarchy. You just said that we live in democracy. In democracy disputes are settled in court.
- 6y ago
- phailhaus 6y agoThat's not a violation of the ToS.