3 ms·
No, but for $2.4B Magic Leap didn't invent much physics or chemistry either (or anything, really). Seems like a fair comparison. Hell, Cards Against Humanity a
by gruturo 6y ago
No, but for $2.4B Magic Leap didn't invent much physics or chemistry either (or anything, really). Seems like a fair comparison.
Hell, Cards Against Humanity achieved more (and faster, cheaper) with their hole in the ground Black Friday fundraiser: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/27/503502142/people-donated-nearly-100-000-to-dig-a-big-pointless-hole-in-the-ground https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/27/503502142...
- cma 6y agoI'm not saying Magic Leap is better, I'm just saying what is their tech advantage and innovation and how is it comparable to people doing novel nuclear physics? So far they have lost money and paid out more in a celebrity fundraiser bonus than all profitable quarters combined.