4 ms·
Probably a fair point. I hadn't really taken typescript into account for the purposes of this library.
by harrisonhope 6y ago
Probably a fair point. I hadn't really taken typescript into account for the purposes of this library.
- mikewhy 6y agoSince in TS you can guarantee the user has optional chaining, so it may not be that big a change // instead of useHookedOnState('app.components.counterValue', 0) // maybe useHookedOnState(state => state.app?.components?.counterValue, 0) edit: on second thought, you're probably using that string in the setter as well. dang.
- harrisonhope 6y agoYup, that's the "magic" part.