4 ms·
This has nothing whatsoever to do with science. You made no hypothesis rather based the “postulate” off the lower bound of your observation over a very small sa
by schr0dinger 6y ago
This has nothing whatsoever to do with science. You made no hypothesis rather based the “postulate” off the lower bound of your observation over a very small sample set.
Imagine this, write a C program where you write x million functions where each simply returns a single number (ie three_million = return 3000000) etc. then the codebase contains as many lines as you can imagine and up to int overflow (or use bignumber lib) and 0% of your bugs are related to memory safeness.