> am don't know where there problem is supposed to be The problem is that Twitter is supposed to be a platform. But by appending to user-generated content, reg

> am don't know where there problem is supposed to be The problem is that Twitter is supposed to be a platform. But by appending to user-generated content, regardless of their good intentions, they've crossed the line from platform to reviewer-editor. Furthermore if you read the "fact check" statements in this instance, they too are primarily subjective opinions. Only one statement contained any statistical data and it was irrelevant. So Twitter was further editorialising by implying that some other users' opinions were more significant.