> But for legal purposes, they are cloaking themselves in the same privileged status as a phone company Hum I don't think that could possibly be true. What le

> But for legal purposes, they are cloaking themselves in the same privileged status as a phone company Hum I don't think that could possibly be true. What leads you to think this? Phone companies existed before Section 230 and as far as I know their behavior didn't change. Have you read Section 230? It definitely reads like it was passed to give entities like Twitter more power to delete objectionable content and it definitely doesn't read to me like it obligates them to be neutral. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230