3 ms·
Why do it for everyone? This was clearly for the benefit of correcting mis-information which was trying to influence democratic voting by a political figure try
by neumann 6y ago
Why do it for everyone? This was clearly for the benefit of correcting mis-information which was trying to influence democratic voting by a political figure trying to undermine the legal voting rights to benefit their own re-election at a mass scale. I believe that is a reasonably good thing to protect regardless of where on the political spectrum one sits (except maybe totalitarianism)..
- tal8d 6y agoBecause you can't selectively act as a publisher when it suits you while enjoying the legal protections afforded to a platform, you have to pick one. > This was clearly for the benefit of correcting mis-information To be clear, they provided "additional context" to somebody's opinion - by linking to someone else's opinion. No statistics provided, no attempt at addressing the troubling events going on with NJ mail-in ballots... > I believe that is a reasonably good thing to protect regardless of where on the political spectrum one sits How about we stick with the law. This has been a long time coming, not just for twitter - but Google and Mastercard... the debanking has been going on for a while.