4 ms·
Right, it's 100% wordplay for political reasons. I really don't like Trump. He probably should be tried in Hague for what's happening at the border with caged
by inerte 6y ago
Right, it's 100% wordplay for political reasons.
I really don't like Trump. He probably should be tried in Hague for what's happening at the border with caged children. He's a white nationalist destroying US institutions, and withdrawing the country from world leadership and handing it to China, a much worse outcome.
Still, you said he lies and should be fact checked for saying "the long-disproved Russian Collusion Hoax" - I just came here to say, that despite the consequences of the interference, where a US candidate gladly accepted Russian election manipulation, wanted Russia to investigate an US citizen, and weakened the world's oldest standing democracy... still wasn't collusion, as you sourced (twice).
- sammalloy 6y ago> still wasn’t collusion There was a conspiracy, supported by both investigations. Whether the evidence rises to the level of implicating the president, wasn’t a conclusion left for Mueller, it was left for the Senate, which chose to ignore the evidence.
- Simulacra 6y agoThe House intelligence committee led by a Democrat, Adam Schiff, found no evidence of collusion... "Newly released documents show he knew all along that there was no proof of Russia-Trump collusion." https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts-11589326164 https://www.wsj.com/articles/all-the-adam-schiff-transcripts... Now who's right, you or the Wall Street Journal? Who gets to decide that? What if HN said this is clear evidence you're wrong, so we're going to put a disclaimer on your post because you're wrong.