3 ms·
That sounds to me like the outcome of both options are: 1) Toxic, awful to use sites with no personalization (custom recommendations, curation, etc) 2) Sites
by smeeth 6y ago
That sounds to me like the outcome of both options are:
1) Toxic, awful to use sites with no personalization (custom recommendations, curation, etc)
2) Sites get more careful (and expensive to operate) because they don't want to get sued.
I really doubt #1 is even a tenable business. Who uses a site like that? On the other hand I really like the idea of more careful social media sites.
- mjburgess 6y agoUnder (2), I don't think it's a matter of expense. As a publisher, you'd need editorial control over all users content (literally billions of people). A publisher platform with a billion users is untennable. There isnt enough money or people in the world to police it. Maybe the distinction between publishers and platforms is too archaic for digital platforms.
- rbanffy 6y agoAbout 1, you can demonstrate that with the various chan sites and with the gab.ai Twitter clone.