4 ms·
> "I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online," No platform really wants to be the arbiter of
by jmull 6y ago
> "I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,"
No platform really wants to be the arbiter of truth. The problem is, if you punt on that entirely you’re 4chan or some other cesspool.
Anyway, Zuck is being pretty disingenuous here, though, because Facebook does have community standards... they just don’t apply to politicians and other influential people. Facebook wants to give them free reign but control regular people.
Pretty dystopian, IMO, though hopefully more people will recognize this and drop Facebook.
- kobayashy 6y agowhat's wrong with 4chan apart from /fit?
- diebeforei485 6y agoThey can have an independent group of fact checkers to act as a jury of sorts (Facebook did something like this for a while, idk if they still do).
- growlist 6y agoThe sad truth is: anything that goes against the MSM's agenda is generally better covered on 4chan/alternate cesspool.
- joubert 6y agoExample link?