4 ms·
IIRC, they are not liable if they just host the comments, not if they endorse them. I guess every comment without a "fake /dubious" label is true? (Cause I'm a
by onetimemanytime 6y ago
IIRC, they are not liable if they just host the comments, not if they endorse them. I guess every comment without a "fake /dubious" label is true?
(Cause I'm about to drink a gallon of bleach and eat 2 lbs of raw garlic to ward off Covid as per a tweet's instruction ;) (joking) )
- ddoolin 6y agoEven if they were the publisher in this scenario and were liable for his comment AND their annotation, there is nothing illegal about it.
- elpool2 6y agoTwitter could put "Everything trump says is false!" underneath every Trump tweet and it would still be perfectly legal.
- jklein11 6y agoI don't think the executive action targets the fact check label on Trump's tweet specifically. I think Twitter did something that really pissed Trump off and Trump is using Section 230 as leverage and a way to extend the narrative of "Twitter is plotting against me so don't believe everything you read." This is neither here nor there but I have considered my self a republican for the last 28 years of my life. This president's actions make me feel physically ill.