You, from my point of view, disproved nothing. Can you intersperse regexps-as-language-feature with regexps-as-a-library? If answer is "yes", then, I think, yo

You, from my point of view, disproved nothing. Can you intersperse regexps-as-language-feature with regexps-as-a-library? If answer is "yes", then, I think, you actually proven my point and what is language feature is, actually, a library in disguise. A special kind of library, so to say. If answer is "no", then if you miss something in first thing (an ability to add arbitrary parsing from these libraries, for example) you need to convince language maintainers to work for you, at least, review your work and your proposal.