5 ms·
>And settle down everyone, they are being recycled, not dumped in a hole. Recycling is only slightly better than throwing away. There is no conceivable reason
by jrace 6y ago
>And settle down everyone, they are being recycled, not dumped in a hole.
Recycling is only slightly better than throwing away.
There is no conceivable reason these could not have been re-sued.
Reduce, Reuse, Recycle - is in that order for a good reason.
- deelowe 6y ago> There is no conceivable reason these could not have been re-sued. These seem like fairly conceivable reasons to me: maintenance, liability, safety concerns, and a lack of consumer-grade charging equipment
- labster 6y agoWhy sell people a product when you can offer them a service and make even more money? Reduce and Reuse are bad for business, making Recycle the only economically viable option. EDIT: @downvoter, can you tell me how our business climate doesn't suck this way?
- xenocyon 6y agoCorrect, and furthermore the environmental gap keeps decreasing with each step to the right: in terms of impact, recycling is much closer to landfilling than it is to reusing.