4 ms·
That seems to be the exact opposite of their stated policy position on CDA 230[0]. I don't see anything about how they support private sites losing protections
by imadethis 6y ago
That seems to be the exact opposite of their stated policy position on CDA 230[0]. I don't see anything about how they support private sites losing protections for removing speech hosted on the platform. Do you have a source for your claims?
[0] https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230 https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230.