3 ms·
It means those companies will need to do censoring better job rather than peddling a certain unstantiate views as truth and claimed it is universally fact check
by ikerdanzel 6y ago
It means those companies will need to do censoring better job rather than peddling a certain unstantiate views as truth and claimed it is universally fact checked like evans evans evans (yeah, who fact check the fact checker and so on?). Or else, they get sue by anyone. Expect many social media companies to be less meddling now as they can't afford to be the next gawker. Lawsuit is very stressful and tiring even if you can afford to lose. Just go ask Bill Gates his monumental IE court adventure decades ago.
Trump's motive is questionable, but the outcome of this is definitely better for the society. Many social media has not check and balance due to that 230. Now we the people able to check and balance while getting paid handsomely for doing so. Just see how CNN behave before and after Sandmann.