3 ms·
It read to me as a personal story about adopting new techniques. People usually: 1. stumble over differences from their normal approach 2. catch on and use it
by drewcoo 6y ago
It read to me as a personal story about adopting new techniques. People usually:
1. stumble over differences from their normal approach
2. catch on and use it everywhere (Stockholm syndrome? Testing limits?)
3. finally find places it doesn't work and can apply judiciously
Given that in our profession we're constantly learning and experimenting, Uncle Bob is still doing that to this day.
- billjings 6y agoBut Bob didn't take a moment to see if or how he could integrate his existing knowledge into this new way of doing things, or ask if there might be something he's not seeing. I've taken those concerns to people in the clojure community, and they've been accommodating. That there are drawbacks to the REPL feedback loop is true. But they aren't the drawbacks Bob claims to have found here, because he ceased investigating at the point he felt his priors were confirmed.