5 ms·

I just left the following comment: -- It's pretty lame to copy the design and trade dress of another product. It does not bode well for your skill or ability.

by joshu 16y ago

I just left the following comment: -- It's pretty lame to copy the design and trade dress of another product. It does not bode well for your skill or ability. Backstory: A long time ago I wrote Delicious. We had hundreds of copycats and competitors. The ones that weren't direct copies were the ones that did better. I'm sure this doesn't apply to you for whatever reason.

deleted 16y ago
[deleted]
rudiger 16y ago
If Qato is going to copy someone's design, can't they find something better than Quora? I mean, Quora's design isn't going to win them any awards; it looks like Quora didn't even use Photoshop, just straight-up CSS.
- joshu 16y ago
  Because they are unoriginal followers. If they had any sense of direction they'd be able to build something of their own.
  - joshu 16y ago
    Ok. I know it's against the rules, but why is this getting voted down? This comment comes from my experience (see above) rather than mere negative opinion.
  - rhizome 16y ago
    Originality is overrated. Various sites with CSS-only layouts and minimal interfaces are best described as an emergent aesthetic. Expect more like this. There are simply too many people drawing from the historical experiences and examples laid by e.g. Metafilter, Digg, image boards, etc. for it to consititute individual acts of copying. That there are so many whitelabel apps & plugins ready for the implementing only accelerates this evolution.
    - joshu 16y ago
      There is a big difference between convergent evolution and wholesale copying.
      - rhizome 16y ago
        It's not convergent evolution when people are copying, but copying doesn't obviate emerging aesthetics. Once upon a time, websites did not all have menu bars across the top, is this a result of despicable copying, or of lots of people simply deciding it was a good idea? Whether or not I think a given UX trope is useful is irrelevant to others choosing so.
        joshu 16y ago
        Straw man. We are discussing wholesale duplication.
        rhizome 16y ago
        My assertion is quantity-neutral. I simply don't think it matters how much is copied, just the fact that any copying is going on at all signals that the look and functionality is having an influence.
- mikeryan 16y ago
  It doesn't just look like they don't use photoshop. They "design in code". http://www.quora.com/Joel-Lewenstein/Life-Without-Photoshop http://www.quora.com/Joel-Lewenstein/Life-Without-Photoshop
  - famousactress 16y ago
    Wow, thanks for sharing. Really neat writeup.
joshu 16y ago
Huh. This comment has been deleted. Was it the admins or did Rick not enjoy the criticism?

by joshu 16y ago

deleted 16y ago

[deleted]

rudiger 16y ago

If Qato is going to copy someone's design, can't they find something better than Quora? I mean, Quora's design isn't going to win them any awards; it looks like Quora didn't even use Photoshop, just straight-up CSS.

joshu 16y ago
Because they are unoriginal followers. If they had any sense of direction they'd be able to build something of their own.
- joshu 16y ago
  Ok. I know it's against the rules, but why is this getting voted down? This comment comes from my experience (see above) rather than mere negative opinion.
- rhizome 16y ago
  Originality is overrated. Various sites with CSS-only layouts and minimal interfaces are best described as an emergent aesthetic. Expect more like this. There are simply too many people drawing from the historical experiences and examples laid by e.g. Metafilter, Digg, image boards, etc. for it to consititute individual acts of copying. That there are so many whitelabel apps & plugins ready for the implementing only accelerates this evolution.
  - joshu 16y ago
    There is a big difference between convergent evolution and wholesale copying.
    - rhizome 16y ago
      It's not convergent evolution when people are copying, but copying doesn't obviate emerging aesthetics. Once upon a time, websites did not all have menu bars across the top, is this a result of despicable copying, or of lots of people simply deciding it was a good idea? Whether or not I think a given UX trope is useful is irrelevant to others choosing so.
      - joshu 16y ago
        Straw man. We are discussing wholesale duplication.
        rhizome 16y ago
        My assertion is quantity-neutral. I simply don't think it matters how much is copied, just the fact that any copying is going on at all signals that the look and functionality is having an influence.
mikeryan 16y ago
It doesn't just look like they don't use photoshop. They "design in code". http://www.quora.com/Joel-Lewenstein/Life-Without-Photoshop http://www.quora.com/Joel-Lewenstein/Life-Without-Photoshop
- famousactress 16y ago
  Wow, thanks for sharing. Really neat writeup.

joshu 16y ago

Huh. This comment has been deleted. Was it the admins or did Rick not enjoy the criticism?