>most likely in the homophobic/sexist way that one is the wife, and their role is to support the "husband". a guy would share his life with another guy. Based

>most likely in the homophobic/sexist way that one is the wife, and their role is to support the "husband". a guy would share his life with another guy. Based on that i see it is a natural to assign higher probability to the event that "the guy would also like to support his husband by sharing the business venture of the husband" - and you call this assignment of the higher probability as "homophobic/sexist"?