Section 230 should stay but the definition of re-publisher vs publisher should be narrowed down. The law should be written such that if you go beyond removing

Section 230 should stay but the definition of re-publisher vs publisher should be narrowed down. The law should be written such that if you go beyond removing spam and illegal content, and especially if you are editorializing user-submitted content, you are are a publisher, rather than a re-publisher. This will put large platforms in a situation where they will have to chose whether they maintain neutrality. Each platform can then pick whether to be a publisher or a re-publisher.