The twitter link above does a good job. Two most important things that stuck out to me is: 1. Platform vs Publisher. Alleges Twitter's fact checks to be editor

The twitter link above does a good job. Two most important things that stuck out to me is: 1. Platform vs Publisher. Alleges Twitter's fact checks to be editorial content, and thus does not benefit from platform protections. Ditto for other large tech companies. 2. Agencies need to review sites they advertise on and report on items including "viewpoint-based speech restrictions", and restrict funding if it is not "appropriate" for that agency's speech. Presumably a way to force companies to be friendlier to the sort of politics of the person who is making the report.