4 ms·

"A few 10s of European"... I think you should correct Wikipedia. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster https://secure.wikimedia.org/

by maigret 16y ago

"A few 10s of European"... I think you should correct Wikipedia. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Chernobyl_dis... "Estimates of the total number of deaths attributable to the accident vary enormously, from possibly 4,000 to close to a million".

iujyhgtfhj 16y ago
That's including 0.01% lifetime extra cancer risk * 100M people If you are going to do that then a single cigarette ad on a formula 1 car kills more people than Hiroshima.
- jshen 16y ago
  then how are you counting?
- bioh42_2 16y ago
  If you are going to do that then a single cigarette ad on a formula 1 car kills more people than Hiroshima. Maybe not a single ad, but certainly cigarettes do, and it is a valid way to count.
Wientje 16y ago
Forget wikipedia and go the site of the World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241594179_eng.pdf http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241594179_eng.pd... http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/chernobyl_digest_report_EN.pdf http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/chernobyl_di... The reports range from 4000 extra cancer deaths (of 100 000 deaths) to 10 000 deaths out of a million. While 10000 isn't small, it represents a 1% increase in cancer related deaths. Stricter smoking laws can save more people than a nuclear stop.