> As a US citizen, I would prefer to have 0 such convictions great, but what does that have to do with providing evidence that > There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that

> As a US citizen, I would prefer to have 0 such convictions great, but what does that have to do with providing evidence that > There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent." is not substantial nonsense based on zero evidence, but more importantly (given that this thread is about "lying"), that > The Governor of California is sending Ballots to millions of people, anyone living in the state, no matter who they are or how they got there, will get one. isn't at all true?