3 ms·

What ideas do you think didn't work out? Btw, I'm currently a very happy user of intercooler. Thanks for the awesome lib.

• recursivedoubts 6y ago
  I think the implicit dependency system is a good example that ended up confusing people as much as it helped: http://intercoolerjs.org/docs.html#dependencies http://intercoolerjs.org/docs.html#dependencies The fact that intercooler didn't have an extension mechanism meant I had to heap a lot of stuff into the core (e.g. ic-action) that was interesting and useful, but made the code base messy and unfocused. htmx has an extension mechanism, so you can pull in stuff like this (or write your own extension): https://htmx.org/extensions/ https://htmx.org/extensions/ that will take pressure off me to keep adding stuff to htmx and simply add more extensions. The dependencies idea from intercooler, for example, ended up as this extension: https://htmx.org/extensions/path-deps/ https://htmx.org/extensions/path-deps/
  • spyckie2 6y ago
    really cool to hear insights from package creators, thanks for sharing
  • andybak 6y ago
    Interesting. I was a fan of intercooler and used it in production more than once but for some reason I could never get my head round the dependency functionality and ended up just ignoring it. Intercooler works beautifully alongside Django and Django Rest Framework and I look forward to trying out htmx.
    • recursivedoubts 6y ago
      thank you andy, i have always appreciated your positive feedback on intercooler :)