4 ms·
Yeah, but no one really says "quadratically slower" in the real world, while "exponentially slower" is used by regular non-CS/math/stats people. It's a forgivab
by spankalee 6y ago
Yeah, but no one really says "quadratically slower" in the real world, while "exponentially slower" is used by regular non-CS/math/stats people. It's a forgivable inaccuracy.
- strombofulous 6y agoIf they're referencing Big-O notation, in my opinion it is fair to assume that the people reading it are CS/math/stats people
- Vervious 6y agoExponentially slower is flat out false though in this case