3 ms·

Where do you see the data that 80% of people are asymptomatic? You complain elsewhere in this thread of being dismissed even when you have data, yet provide non

Where do you see the data that 80% of people are asymptomatic? You complain elsewhere in this thread of being dismissed even when you have data, yet provide none. We understand that you think that the lockdowns are bunk and that this is a big non-issue cooked up by the world to ruin our lives; sure, maybe, but where is the data?

nickthemagicman 6y ago
Here is a medical journal sufficient? This is more study than was given to full lockdowns. This was posted to Hacker News a few weeks ago as well. https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/27/thoraxjnl-2020-215091.full https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/27/thoraxjnl-20... "We understand that you think that the lockdowns are bunk " Correction...lockdowns ARE bunk. WHERES THE SECOND WAVE? Why hasn't Sweden followed the model of exponential explosion that was used to justify the lockdowns. The flat curver movement was unscientific and wrong and you would do well to fight unscientific attacks on your civil freedoms with all of your vigour going forward because this isn't the last time this will be attempted.
- wbronitsky 6y ago
  Thank you for posting the data. These are both brand new from yesterday, however, so I’m not sure why the tone here is so belligerent. Either way, this is incredibly interesting, and something we should continue to look into going forward. It sure would be nice to ease up on the lockdowns if they are not the correct path going forward.
  - nickthemagicman 6y ago
    If you do some research and start questioning the narrative the amount of demonization and arrogant dismissiveness you get for it will make you belligerent. lol People are scared and when you disagree with the experts even if you're right you get treated poorly.
    - deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
nickthemagicman 6y ago
Additionally, the only closed system study we've had of this, is a cruise ship. And this was replicated there. 80% asymptomatics. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/over-80percent-of-coronavirus-patients-on-cruise-ship-had-no-symptoms-study-says.html https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/over-80percent-of-coronaviru...

nickthemagicman 6y ago

Here is a medical journal sufficient? This is more study than was given to full lockdowns. This was posted to Hacker News a few weeks ago as well. https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/27/thoraxjnl-2020-215091.full https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/27/thoraxjnl-20... "We understand that you think that the lockdowns are bunk " Correction...lockdowns ARE bunk. WHERES THE SECOND WAVE? Why hasn't Sweden followed the model of exponential explosion that was used to justify the lockdowns. The flat curver movement was unscientific and wrong and you would do well to fight unscientific attacks on your civil freedoms with all of your vigour going forward because this isn't the last time this will be attempted.

wbronitsky 6y ago
Thank you for posting the data. These are both brand new from yesterday, however, so I’m not sure why the tone here is so belligerent. Either way, this is incredibly interesting, and something we should continue to look into going forward. It sure would be nice to ease up on the lockdowns if they are not the correct path going forward.
- nickthemagicman 6y ago
  If you do some research and start questioning the narrative the amount of demonization and arrogant dismissiveness you get for it will make you belligerent. lol People are scared and when you disagree with the experts even if you're right you get treated poorly.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]

nickthemagicman 6y ago

Additionally, the only closed system study we've had of this, is a cruise ship. And this was replicated there. 80% asymptomatics. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/over-80percent-of-coronavirus-patients-on-cruise-ship-had-no-symptoms-study-says.html https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/over-80percent-of-coronaviru...