3 ms·
It’s factually irrelevant since no facts are expressed. That’s just opinion. I guess the racist part could be arguable, but that’s more opinion than fact.
by arrrg 6y ago
It’s factually irrelevant since no facts are expressed. That’s just opinion.
I guess the racist part could be arguable, but that’s more opinion than fact.
- m0zg 6y agoThat's factually very relevant, in fact, because you know which "facts" will be picked and chosen by this "executive", in spite of the pretense of impartiality.
- croon 6y agoExtending benefit of the doubt: Are "some" facts worse than no facts? What facts (either real or hypothetical) do you believe are missing?