3 ms·
The argument sounds nonsensical because it’s missing a verb. I don’t agree that just because people will use a free thing that means it has a lot of value. Not
by enneff 6y ago
The argument sounds nonsensical because it’s missing a verb.
I don’t agree that just because people will use a free thing that means it has a lot of value. Note I didn’t say that FB has no value, just that it might not be as valuable as one might think.
Considering most of their value is their messenger platform I don’t think FB is really worth much at all beyond their social graph.
- bhupy 6y ago> The argument sounds nonsensical because it’s missing a verb. That's a typo on my part — it doesn't change the veracity of the argument. > I don’t agree that just because people will use a free thing that means it has a lot of value. Note I didn’t say that FB has no value, just that it might not be as valuable as one might think. Sure, but how do you measure the "true" value? If you can answer that question, you will probably become a billionaire. > Considering most of their value is their messenger platform I don’t think FB is really worth much at all beyond their social graph. What are you basing this on? You may only find the messenger platform to be valuable, but how do you know how others perceive the FB platform/product?
- enneff 6y agoI’m going on what I’ve observed in FB users around the world. Their most dedicated users are people in developing countries whom they have convinced that Facebook is the internet.