> The current US law regarding restaurants is in fact that an commercial establishment have very little freedom to refuse to save people based on who they are.

> The current US law regarding restaurants is in fact that an commercial establishment have very little freedom to refuse to save people based on who they are. I was referring to non-protected classes of people. For example, I have the right to refuse to serve someone who has written bad checks at my establishment, for example. Or I have the right to refuse service to someone who has caused harm to my clients. Which leads back to my question: Should I be forced to serve these people?