3 ms·
That's surprising. It even has a wikipedia page. Given the fact that no new languages will ever succeed ever again due to the deletionism in wikipedia I've sta
by wbhart 16y ago
That's surprising. It even has a wikipedia page.
Given the fact that no new languages will ever succeed ever again due to the deletionism in wikipedia I've started making a list of languages everyone should have heard of:
dao, nimrod, pure, rust, factor, coffeescript, boo, scotch, ela, vala, ooc, x10, bitc, arc, newlisp, cobra, seed7, wirbel (no longer developed)
- mudge 16y agoCool. Yes, I know that Pure had to do some fighting to keep its wikipedia webpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pure_%28programming_language%29_%282nd_nomination%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion...
- Semiapies 16y agoBut hey, every single episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer has its own descriptive article, and that's what's important, right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffy_episodes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffy_episodes