3 ms·

Nostalgic? No, you're displaying a reasonable response to a screwy situation. Did everyone just forget about the Netflix Prize? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wik

Nostalgic? No, you're displaying a reasonable response to a screwy situation. Did everyone just forget about the Netflix Prize? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix_Prize https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix_Prize] There was a brief time when they had the absolute best recommendation algorithm on the planet. It was intentionally replaced by something utterly different which is geared to simply steer everyone to IP that they own. It is not remotely similar. I have absolutely hated every change they've made to their UI since they ditched the old ratings system, too (forces you to use the mouse and sets you up for fumbling what should be clear actions, so you spend more time browsing - which costs them almost nothing - and less time watching). My guess is, research indicated they'd make more money with these changes than by licensing content audiences actually prefer and building a sane interface. As it turns out, the Netflix golden age was a short-lived anomaly if not outright farce. If you want decent curation of content and also to be able to watch it, you will have to pay through the nose or pirate. Same as it ever was. It's consumer hostile, but the system is working as its overseers intend. Whether it's really the best long term strategy is still an open question in my book.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
laurex 6y ago
The problem with a recommendation engine is that it breaks down when content options are limited. In Netflix's early days of streaming, they had a similar approach to content as they did with DVDs, i.e. capitalizing on the long tail and offering an enormous selection. That proved to be inefficient for streaming because there's a minimum bar at which rightsholders will sell licences, and it's far higher than just the price of a few DVDs. Thus, Netflix switched to a more limited acquisition model, and then began a more aggressive program of content creation to effectively gate its offer from competing services. The upside of this for consumers has been a shift by many talented creators into series-style content; the downside is that the market for independently-produced films has bottomed out considerably.

deleted 6y ago

[deleted]

laurex 6y ago

The problem with a recommendation engine is that it breaks down when content options are limited. In Netflix's early days of streaming, they had a similar approach to content as they did with DVDs, i.e. capitalizing on the long tail and offering an enormous selection. That proved to be inefficient for streaming because there's a minimum bar at which rightsholders will sell licences, and it's far higher than just the price of a few DVDs. Thus, Netflix switched to a more limited acquisition model, and then began a more aggressive program of content creation to effectively gate its offer from competing services. The upside of this for consumers has been a shift by many talented creators into series-style content; the downside is that the market for independently-produced films has bottomed out considerably.