3 ms·
> swap it out transparently > cryptographically verified to come from the original page Elaborate.
by joshuamorton 6y ago
> swap it out transparently
> cryptographically verified to come from the original page
Elaborate.
- throwaway2048 6y agoThe page results will be a tightly restricted iframe-esque window inside of google results (This is what the Chome "Portals" proposal is about). There will be no obvious distinction between a search result and google's own website, even though the "portals" will be showing cryptographically signed content (which will almost certainly be in a super restricted AMP-esque format that denies sites much control besides what the text says) If google swaps one result for another, 95% of users wont even notice.
- joshuamorton 6y ago> If google swaps one result for another, 95% of users wont even notice. Right so exactly the same way the search results page works today? > The page results will be a tightly restricted iframe-esque window inside of google results This is completely independent of AMP. Portals work for non-AMP content too. > which will almost certainly be in a super restricted AMP-esque format that denies sites much control besides what the text says So you're suggesting that Google will create a new, even more restricted than AMP protocol to be viewed on the search page?
- searchableguy 6y agoIsn't that what those meta tags are for so google can quickly show scores, reviews and stuff?