12 ms·
Gatsby.js raised money, Next.js raised money, and then Gatsby.js raised even more money.
by bithavoc 6y ago
Gatsby.js raised money, Next.js raised money, and then Gatsby.js raised even more money.
- yodon 6y agoThanks for pointer to the next.js raise, this significantly increases the odds I'll use them - the last few times I'd checked the project's commit history, it looked like the lion's share were from one guy who could disappear at any time due to a better job, a girlfriend, or getting hit by a bus.
- subpixel 6y agoI'm curious where Netlify (who has raised $95M) fits in the landscape when the dust settles.
- nogabebop23 6y agoI think their strategy is to commoditize the Next.js and Gatsby differentiation; They host all JAM-stacks pretty equally. The add a lot of paid dynamic add-ons that are hard to do statically (and that they told you were BAD_THINGS at the start) like form processing and user management. I think their model is more realistic as a superset of what Gatsby can offer, but I'm not convinced it justifies 100 million dollars of VC investment. BUT - I'm always off by a factor of 4x (projected costs, effort estimates) so if you think it's worth 25 million, then you should go for it!
- yodon 6y agoI like Netlify but I suspect it's much easier for Gatsby and Next to add Netlify-like functionality to their offerings than the reverse. I suspect one is unlikely to need both (Gatsby SaaS or Next SaaS) and (Netlify SaaS), which doesn't bode well for Netlify.
- armandososa 6y agoOn the other hand, Netlify will support whatever next static framework is in fashion from day one.