3 ms·
His claim wasn't that there will be some amount of fraud... it was that they won't be "anything less than substantially fraudulent" (https://twitter.com/realDon
by ryebit 6y ago
His claim wasn't that there will be some amount of fraud... it was that they won't be "anything less than substantially fraudulent" (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1265255835124539392 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/12652558351245393...).
Claiming mail-in votes will be majority fraudulent, and by implication that the entire vote is invalid... is a much stronger claim, which IMO requires much stronger proof.
Given that mail-in ballots have been in used for a long time, there's a good history of data, so it's not predicting the future out of nothing, but based on past evidence.
The twitter fact-check link in fact goes into that precise thing.
- 2019-nCoV 6y agoHow many fraudulent votes constitutes a substantial amount? What percentage?