3 ms·
If that’s the case, then we eventually won’t need shutterstock.
by chris_wot 6y ago
If that’s the case, then we eventually won’t need shutterstock.
- t0astbread 6y agoWait, why? Because eventually everything will end up in the public domain? Not arguing for or against anything here but Shutterstock is the distributor not the creator, so they theoretically never "loose importance" in the scenario where stock photography hits a ceiling, right?