2 ms·

(I've moved my comment to the intended parent comment): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23322672 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23322672

• zozbot234 6y ago
  Except that leftists and libs have their own sort of low-value hateful garbage. Which usually doesn't get censored or "fact-checked" on Twitter.
  • happytoexplain 6y ago
    True, but Twitter's hypocrisy doesn't relate to my point. But you're totally justified in that confusion, because my comment that you're replying to somehow ended up on the wrong parent. Here it is in the correct location: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23322672 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23322672 Edit: To clarify, I'm saying it doesn't relate because my point is that deleting hateful garbage off a private platform isn't censorship, and Twitter should fix their hypocrisy by deleting all hateful garbage with equal veracity, rather than the alternate fix, which would be to allow it all.
  • deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  • shadowgovt 6y ago
    If Twitter's going to have a fact-checking feature, using it exclusively for Presidents and not the userbase at large feels like a fine use of it.
  • ceejayoz 6y ago
    > Except that leftists and libs have their own sort of low-value hateful garbage. Any of similar prominence to the President of the United States?