2 ms·
> Also, LGPL is already problematic, because you cannot link statically with it. Damn. I just wrote the whole top level comment to explain that you can link st
by Nokinside 6y ago
> Also, LGPL is already problematic, because you cannot link statically with it.
Damn. I just wrote the whole top level comment to explain that you can link statically LGPL code and how to do it with details.
- abjKT26nO8 6y agoThat's just a workaround. Now I need to add *.o files to my deb packages. Or ship source code in deb packages? What is it? Gentoo?
- rcxdude 6y agoYou don't, you just need to provide a way to get them (you can even specify that requests must be sent by post and charge postage for the response on a CD). It's not a 'workaround', it's literally how the license is supposed to work.