I'm not opposed to a paywall for any reason other than I won'r pay for content that I don't deem worth it. Not making a statement about the NYT. I just don't re

I'm not opposed to a paywall for any reason other than I won'r pay for content that I don't deem worth it. Not making a statement about the NYT. I just don't read the Times paper edition on a regular basis and therefore see no justification for paying for their online content. There's never been a story so amazing that I couldn't just move on without reading it. I pay for content in some instances, and don't get the anger from people who grit their teeth and declare war on any newspaper who wants to charge for their online content. But it would be more likely for me to pay for my local paper's online content than the NYT.