Not patronising at all. Also did not provide any info viz. 1. I encouraged you to provide a citation to support your own point which I AGREED WITH. You have no

Not patronising at all. Also did not provide any info viz. 1. I encouraged you to provide a citation to support your own point which I AGREED WITH. You have not. 2. I asked a question about whether different ethnicities are treated differently in chinese law. You avoided answering. 3. I gave an example of greater freedom under UK & US law. You have not acknowledged this presumably because it is inconveniently true. 4. I asked in good faith for some reading material on whatever was about Xinjiang. You have not provided this. If I am "completely invested in strong opinions" then change my mind with facts. It was a worthless and pretty patronising reply. Provide relevant facts. I presume the Xinjiang thing was this mass imprisonment thingy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_re-education_camps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_re-education_camps