> The article has a very strong "throw enough sh__ and see how much of it sticks" tone to it. It's intpolicydigest. What did you expect? What you don't know wh

> The article has a very strong "throw enough sh__ and see how much of it sticks" tone to it. It's intpolicydigest. What did you expect? What you don't know what intpolicydigest is? Yeah me either. But the article is just the rehash of the same propaganda you see all over social media and "news" sites like foxnews, breitbart, etc. That china has some pull in media due to its potential lucrative market isn't news. But the idea that they have enablers is laughable. If they had enablers, we wouldn't have had nonstop propaganda about ughyurs, organs, coronavirus, etc for months on end. Israel, Saudi Arabia and britain have enablers in our media. China is on the outside looking in. But I have a sneaking suspicions intpolicydigest isn't going to run hitpieces on israel or saudi arabia. Speaking of enablers, I would love to see who the enablers of "intpolicydigest" are.