> I feel like YouTube is doing their best with a really hard problem Two aspects of the problems are very easy: first, the automated parts of the review system

> I feel like YouTube is doing their best with a really hard problem Two aspects of the problems are very easy: first, the automated parts of the review system can be marked as such. Automated emails can trivially be signed "You Tube Bot" or something (such signalling should perhaps be mandated by law). Second, when a video has been reviewed and found "not guilty" once, it can be marked as such, and past reviews recorded. Preventing automated takedowns for the same reason, or requiring stronger reviews, is trivial (though more costly for the videos that do end up being re-reviewed). They may have other reasons not to pluck those two low hanging fruits, but difficulty is probably not one of them.