3 ms·

Are you an infosec expert? You have said that it is impossible to trace origins of hacks multiple times but only offer two shallow points that you would learn a

Are you an infosec expert? You have said that it is impossible to trace origins of hacks multiple times but only offer two shallow points that you would learn about in your first week of a network security class. There are papers out there that have multiple ways of using language to identify specific authors, determine multiple authors, and even decode unknown language. That's my first shallow example and would be a pretty reliable indicator if you could get your hands on their code. With a budget of millions of dollar I'm sure they have dozens of ways that can be combined. It would make no sense to reveal every single method they use to defend against people on the internet. That also assumes they don't just have a mole who told them about it, which they also wouldn't reveal.

boomboomsubban 6y ago
>You have said that it is impossible to trace origins of hacks I have not said this. The evidence they have provided makes it equally likely that they've tracked these hacks (correctly or incorrectly) or that they've made the whole thing up. You can't rule out either action. >There are papers out there that have multiple uses of using language to identify specific authors, determine multiple authors, and even decode known language. That's my first shallow example and would be a pretty reliable indicator if you could get your hands on their code There have been multiple papers on these subjects, with a budget of millions of dollars I'm sure identifiers could be faked. Particularly with password spraying, the only method mentioned.
- Larrikin 6y ago
  Every single comment on the first page of your history is vehemently defending the CCP, I'd imagine that the faux outrage against accusations across the internet is another signal they use to increase the probability that their model correctly determined the origin.

boomboomsubban 6y ago

>You have said that it is impossible to trace origins of hacks I have not said this. The evidence they have provided makes it equally likely that they've tracked these hacks (correctly or incorrectly) or that they've made the whole thing up. You can't rule out either action. >There are papers out there that have multiple uses of using language to identify specific authors, determine multiple authors, and even decode known language. That's my first shallow example and would be a pretty reliable indicator if you could get your hands on their code There have been multiple papers on these subjects, with a budget of millions of dollars I'm sure identifiers could be faked. Particularly with password spraying, the only method mentioned.

Larrikin 6y ago
Every single comment on the first page of your history is vehemently defending the CCP, I'd imagine that the faux outrage against accusations across the internet is another signal they use to increase the probability that their model correctly determined the origin.