4 ms·
U.S. lawmakers unveil bold $100B plan to remake NSF
- lykr0n 6y agoAmazing step forward it seems, but not without it's issues. I'm cautiously optimistic, but we need to see a finalized version of this bill before we get excited or disappointed.
- yodon 6y agoI'm not optimistic about an anti-science administration remaking the NSF
- thephyber 6y agoThis is a proposed bill by 2 US senators. I'll worry about that if it passes Congress and the president has to decide whether to veto it (his 2020 budget proposal cut NSF's budget by 6-7%).
- wwarner 6y agoI honestly like the sound of a technology directorate. I'd love to see some basic research into new computing technology, based on topological insulators or optics.
- bassman9000 6y agoMany academic leaders are praising the legislation, which was spearheaded by the Senate’s top Democrat, Chuck Schumer (NY), and co-sponsored by Senator Todd Young (R–IN) [...] The real news, I'd say.
- rogerkirkness 6y agoSenators are basically always more competent / practical than Presidents. It's basically why the Senate exists.
- dimator 6y agoThe entire point of the Congress is compromise. Whenever I see joint legislation like this it gives me hope that despite our hyper partisan climate, there is at least some collaboration still happening.
- downerending 6y agoMe too, though I'm still stinging a bit from Bayh-Dole. Sometimes reaching across the aisle is a great way to produce something awful.
- shariqm 6y agoAs someone who was often distracted from grad school research to work on grant applications this is great news. I would caution against making the NSF more like DARPA though. DARPA definitely breathes down your neck asking for monthly updates that hinders research/ideas that take longer to develop. Federal research funding should be directed towards developing big, long-term ideas rather than short-term research tech companies can and do focus on.